Auction versus Posted Price in Experiments: Comparisons of Mean and Marginal Effect
Date
2017-06
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Abstract
Economic experiments have been widely used to elicit individuals’ evaluation for various commodities and non-market goods. Common elicitation methods include auctions and posted price mechanisms. Experimental auctions are theoretically incentive compatible so are assumed to give an unbiased estimate of individuals’ evaluation including willingness to pay (WTP). However, the vast majority of purchasing decisions are not made in auctions but in market settings, such as grocery stores, where consumers make yes/no decisions in response to a set price. In this research, we carefully design an experiment to compare homegrown-value WTP estimates between an auction and a posted price elicitation format. This design enables us to make both within- and between-subjects comparisons of the mean WTP and marginal effect estimates. Results from 115 adult consumers indicate that WTP estimates obtained from an auction are approximately 32% - 39% smaller than WTP estimates obtained from a posted price mechanism. In addition, we compare the statistical significance and conclude that auctions require a smaller sample size than posted price mechanisms in order to detect the same preference change. Nevertheless, the signs of marginal effects for different product characteristics are consistent in both mechanisms.
Description
Keywords
Auction experiments, Economic evaluation, Homegrown values, Posted price markets, Willingness to pay