The UDSpace Institutional Repository will be unavailable from August 10th - 12th for a planned upgrade.

Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time?

dc.contributor.authorNewman, Harrah R.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Axel C.
dc.contributor.authorMeadows, Kyle D.
dc.contributor.authorHilliard, Rachel L.
dc.contributor.authorBoyes, Madeline S.
dc.contributor.authorVresilovic, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorSchaer, Thomas P.
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Dawn M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T20:01:47Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T20:01:47Z
dc.date.issued2024-04-25
dc.descriptionThis article was originally published in JOR Spine. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.1322. © 2024 The Authors. JOR Spine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society.
dc.description.abstractBackground Cadaveric intervertebral discs are often studied for a variety of research questions, and outcomes are interpreted in the in vivo context. Unfortunately, the cadaveric disc does not inherently represent the LIVE condition, such that the disc structure (geometry), composition (T2 relaxation time), and mechanical function (opening pressure, OP) measured in the cadaver do not necessarily represent the in vivo disc. Methods We conducted serial evaluations in the Yucatan minipig of disc geometry, T2 relaxation time, and OP to quantify the changes that occur with progressive dissection and used axial loading to restore the in vivo condition. Results We found no difference in any parameter from LIVE to TORSO; thus, within 2 h of sacrifice, the TORSO disc can represent the LIVE condition. With serial dissection and sample preparation the disc height increased (SEGMENT height 18% higher than TORSO), OP decreased (POTTED was 67% lower than TORSO), and T2 time was unchanged. With axial loading, an imposed stress of 0.20–0.33 MPa returned the disc to in vivo, LIVE disc geometry and OP, although T2 time was decreased. There was a linear correlation between applied stress and OP, and this was conserved across multiple studies and species. Conclusion To restore the LIVE disc state in human studies or other animal models, we recommend measuring the OP/stress relationship and using this relationship to select the applied stress necessary to recover the in vivo condition.
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the University of Delaware Center for Biomedical and Brain Imaging for their MRI support and Adriana Barba for veterinary assistance. This work was supported by NIH/NIAMS R01 AR050052, NIH/NIAMS F31 AR081687, and NIH/NIGMS COBRE P20 GM139760.
dc.identifier.citationNewman HR, Moore AC, Meadows KD, et al. Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time? JOR Spine. 2024; 7(2):e1322. doi:10.1002/jsp2.1322
dc.identifier.issn2572-1143
dc.identifier.urihttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/34341
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherJOR Spine
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectaxial load
dc.subjectcadaver
dc.subjectMRI
dc.subjectpreload
dc.subjectpressure
dc.titleCan axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry, opening pressure, and T2 relaxation time?
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Can axial loading restore in vivo disc geometry opening pressure and T2 relaxation time.pdf
Size:
6.68 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: