Anorexigenic and orexigenic peptide response to feedings of different protein composition in healthy formula fed infants

dc.contributor.authorMcEwen, Caitlin Q.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-24T13:21:33Z
dc.date.available2020-03-24T13:21:33Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.updated2020-02-03T13:20:29Z
dc.description.abstractRapid weight gain in infancy is a risk factor for later life overweight and obesity. Diet composition is a key factor affecting growth in infancy. Numerous studies show formula fed infants, the majority of whom are fed cow milk formula (CMF), gain more weight than breastfed infants in the first year of life; whereas infants fed extensive protein hydrolysate formula (EHF) have more normative growth, similar to breastfed infants, the gold standard for infant growth. Infants fed EHF have been shown to satiate at a lower volume and earlier than when fed CMF. The mechanism by which EHF leads to earlier satiation at a lower intake volume is unknown, however it is hypothesized the extensively hydrolyzed protein (small peptides and free amino acids) found in EHF formulas may lead to differential responses in the gastrointestinal peptides that play a role in meal termination (satiation). ☐ The overall aim of this study was to determine the effect of formula composition (EHF vs. CMF) on satiation and adiposity peptide response in healthy, formula fed infants. Infants (n=5 males, n=6 females) ages 1-4 months old were recruited from the greater Newark, Delaware area. Subjects completed 2 study visits within 7-days, and received one test formula, EHF or CMF, at each visit in random order. Blood samples were drawn pre-feeding and post-feeding at each visit to assess differences in peptide response by formula type. ☐ Infants were on average 86 days old (95%CI 70.7-101.4) and weighed 5.8kg (95%CI 5.3-6.4). Although the study was underpowered for all outcomes, preliminary analysis revealed there were no significant differences in the change in concentration of satiation and adiposity peptides by formula type. Further, there were no significant differences in infant feeding dynamics (volume, duration, or rate of feeding) by formula type, although volume and rate of feeding was lower for EHF feeds compared to CMF feeds in 8 of 10 infants. Duration of feeding was inversely correlated with change in PYY concentration, rate of feeding was positively correlated with change in PYY concentration, and time since last feeding was positively correlated with change in PYY and GIP concentrations for CMF but not EHF feeds. Current findings should be interpreted with caution and further analysis with a larger sample size is needed before definitive conclusions may be drawn.en_US
dc.description.advisorTrabulsi, Jillian C.
dc.description.degreeM.S.
dc.description.departmentUniversity of Delaware, Department of Behavioral Health and Nutrition
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.58088/5xqa-pf78
dc.identifier.unique1145826887
dc.identifier.urihttp://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/25104
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherUniversity of Delawareen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://search.proquest.com/docview/2325355382?accountid=10457
dc.titleAnorexigenic and orexigenic peptide response to feedings of different protein composition in healthy formula fed infantsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
McEwen_udel_0060M_12360.pdf
Size:
3.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: