Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature

Author(s)Dineva, Polina K.
Author(s)McGranaghan, Christina
Author(s)Messer, Kent D.
Author(s)Palm-Forster, Leah H.
Author(s)Paul, Laura A.
Author(s)Siders, A. R.
Date Accessioned2023-02-16T16:20:36Z
Date Available2023-02-16T16:20:36Z
Publication Date2023-02-01
DescriptionThis material may be downloaded for personal use only. Any other use requires prior permission of the American Society of Civil Engineers. This material may be found at https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1564. This article was originally published in Natural Hazards Review.
AbstractManaged retreat in the form of voluntary flood-buyout programs provides homeowners with an alternative to repairing and rebuilding residences that have sustained severe flood damage. Buyout programs are most economically efficient when groups of neighboring properties are acquired because they can then create unfragmented flood control areas and reduce the cost of providing local services. However, buyout programs in the United States often fail to acquire such efficient, unfragmented spaces, for various reasons, including long administrative timelines, the way in which buyout offers are made, desires for community cohesion, and attachments to place. Buyout programs have relied primarily on posted price mechanisms involving offers that are accepted or rejected by homeowners with little or no negotiation. In this paper, we describe four alternative strategies that have been used successfully in land-preservation agricultural–environmental contexts to increase acceptance rates and decrease fragmentation: agglomeration bonuses, reverse auctions, target constraints, and hybrid approaches. We discuss challenges that may arise during their implementation in the buyout context—transaction costs, equity and distributional impacts, unintended consequences, and social pressure—and recommend further research into the efficiency and equity of applying these strategies to residential buyout programs with the explicit goal of promoting spatial coordination.
SponsorThis publication was made possible by the National Science Foundation EPSCoR Grant No. 1757353 and the State of Delaware. The findings and conclusions in this manuscript are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or US government determination or policy. This paper was supported by the USDA, Economic Research Service. This research was completed while L. A. Paul was a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Delaware and P. K. Dineva was a graduate student at the University of Delaware.
CitationDineva Polina K., McGranaghan Christina, Messer Kent D., Palm-Forster Leah H., Paul Laura A., and Siders A. R. “Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature.” Natural Hazards Review 24, no. 1 (February 1, 2023): 05022013. https://doi.org/10.1061/NHREFO.NHENG-1564.
ISSN1527-6996
URLhttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/32305
Languageen_US
PublisherNatural Hazards Review
Keywordsadaptation
Keywordsbuyouts
Keywordsland preservation
Keywordsmechanism design
Keywordsagglomeration bonus
Keywordsreverse auction
Keywordstarget constraint
Keywordsequity
TitlePromoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts in the United States: Four Strategies and Four Challenges from the Economics of Land Preservation Literature
TypeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Promoting Spatial Coordination in Flood Buyouts.pdf
Size:
2.64 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: