Is a Non-Representative Convenience Sample Good Enough? Insights from an Economic Experiment
| dc.contributor.author | Sean F. Ellis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Olesya M. Savchenko | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kent D. Messer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-12-01T18:17:59Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-12-01T18:17:59Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-11-19 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Keywords: Non-representative convenience sampling, field experiments, online recruitment, representative sampling | |
| dc.description.abstract | Recruitment of representative and generalizable samples is a major challenge for researchers conducting economic field experiments. Limited access to representative samples or the high cost of obtaining them often leads to the recruitment of non-representative convenience samples. This research compares the findings from two field experiments involving 860 adults: one from a non-representative in-person convenience sample and one from a representative online counterpart. We find no meaningful differences in the key behaviors of interest between these two samples. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature demonstrating that non-representative convenience samples can be sufficient in certain contexts. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | Funding support for this research was provided by the USDA National Institute for Food and Agriculture (grant number: 20166800725064 | |
| dc.identifier.other | JEL Classification: B41, C83, C93 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/31603 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE. | |
| dc.title | Is a Non-Representative Convenience Sample Good Enough? Insights from an Economic Experiment | |
| dc.type | Working Paper |
