Articles
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Articles by Subject "Disaster Research"
Now showing 1 - 12 of 12
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Community Emergency Planning: False Assumptions and Inappropriate Analogies(International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 1994) Dynes, Russell R.Community emergency planning had its roots in military analogies which viewed emergencies as extensions of "enemy attack" scenarios. Such thinking was embedded in early structural arrangements and was generalized as the appropriate normative model for all emergencies. This model viewed emergencies as conditions of social chaos which could be rectified by command and control. It is argued here that such a view is inadequate based on a knowledge of behavior in emergencies and the model is dysfunctional for planning. A more adequate model is presented, based on conditions of continuity, coordination and cooperation. This problem solving model, based on research rather than military analogies, provides a more adequate set of assumptions as the basis for planning. However, legislative and technological "improvements" often make emergency planning more rigid and increasingly inadequate.Item Conceptualizing Disasters from a Sociological Perspective(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1989-11) Quarantelli, E. L.Item Cross-Cultural International Research: Sociology and Disaster(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1988-08) Dynes, Russell R.Early cross-cultural studies of disaster responses are summarized to provide a context for recent collaborative efforts. Many of these have been initiated by researchers from the United States who have joined colleagues in numerous other countries to standardize measurement instruments and assess aspects of the public response. These efforts have highlighted definitional, theoretical, and methodological difficulties which are being addressed in current studies. Finally, current policy developments are described that may encourage future research that is cross-societal in focus and collaborative in implementation.Item Disaster Studies: An Analysis of the Social Historical Factors Affecting the Development of Research in the Area(1987-11) Quarantelli, E. L.Almost nothing has been written about the social historical emergence and development of social and behavioral research on disasters. This paper provides a description and a sociology of scientific knowledge analysis of the factors affecting the initiation of studies in the area in the United States. First, we note how disaster research on group and behavioral aspects of disasters had their roots, almost exclusively, in rather narrowly focused applied questions or practical concerns. Second, we point out how this led to certain kinds of selective emphases in terms of what and how the research was undertaken in the pioneering days, but with substantive consequences which we still see operative today.Item Disaster Studies: The Consequences of the Historical Use of a Sociological Approach in the Development of Research(1994-03) Quarantelli, E. L.An earlier article discussing the initial days of disaster studies noted that the roots of the area in the applied concerns of research funders led to a pattern of how research was done and what was studied that still prevails today. However, this paper stresses that a certain sociological orientation and particular sociological ideas implicitly came to permeate much of the early work and many of the observations and findings made. We also indicate that the research approach, initiated with a mixture of applied concerns and basic sociological questions, has had up to now primarily functional consequences on the development of the field of study of disasters. But the paper concludes with a statement that the field currently needs a fundamental reconceptualization of disaster. It is argued that the impetus for that is more likely to come out of a questioning of basic ideas as well as the growing internationalization of disaster studies than from practical concerns.Item Editors' Introduction(SAGE Publications Limited, 1970) Quarantelli, E. L.; Dynes, Russell R.Item Improving Theory and Research on Hazard Mitigation: Political Economy and Organizational Perspectives(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1989-11) Tierney, Kathleen J.This paper opens with a discussion of the progress that has been made to date in research and theory on mitigation. It goes on to suggest approaches that, by addressing neglected aspects of mitigation-related issues, may improve our understanding of the topic. Woven through the paper are calls for several shifts in emphasis with respect to studies on mitigation: (1) from a social system, consensus model to a conflict model on society and community; (2) from an event-based, discontinuous concept of disaster and mitigation to a view that stresses the continuity between ongoing social life and the disruption occasioned by natural and technological agents; (3) from the study of the social consequences of disasters to the study of aspects of the social order that increase risk and lead to disasters; and (4) from an individualistic, social psychological approach to mitigation to a perspective that takes into account macrolevel social phenomena.Item Methodology of Studying Disasters(SAGE Publications Limited, 1970) Drabek, Thomas E.Item The NORC Research on the Arkansas Tornado: A Fountainhead Study(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1988-11) Quarantelli, E. L.In this review and analysis of the research effort in the disaster area by NORC [National Opinion Research Center] we shall present: (1) the general background of the work; (2)the nature of the field research undertaken; (3) a selective summary of the substantive focus and findings from the largest single field study within the NORC work, namely on the Arkansas tornado; (4) a brief overall assessment of the research done, and (5) some of the important consequences of what NORC did in the disaster area.Item Origin and History of the International Research Committee on Disasters (RC-39)(International Research Committee on Disasters, 2009) Quarantelli, E. L.This version of the origin and history of RC-39 was prepared by E. L. Quarantelli, President Emeritus of the RC-39 and Professor Emeritus, University of Delaware (USA). The RC-39 developed out of the fact that sociologists predominated in the pioneering stage of disaster studies.Item The Structure of Disaster Research: Its Policy and Disciplinary Implications(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1994-03) Dynes, Russell R.; Drabek, Thomas E.The context of sociological research on disaster is discussed by the various settings in which the research tradition has developed. In addition, both funders and users of that research are identified. It is suggested that the most important policy use of disaster research has been to change the conceptualization of disaster. While no specific study can be directly tied to particular policy changes, the overall research tradition has had a transforming effect. That transformation is, of course, more obvious in some societies than in others. In the future, it is suggested that increased attention will be given to disaster preparedness and planning because of more and worse disasters. This means that social science research will continue to thrive because of its potential utility in problem solving. However, future research will be increasingly cast in interdisciplinary terms. Given the reluctance to support basic research, the relationship between applied research and the core disciplines will become more problematic.Item What Should We Study? Questions and Suggestions for Researchers About the Concept of Disasters(Research Committee on Disasters, International Sociological Association, 1987-03) Quarantelli, E. L.