Biomechanics & Movement Science Program
Permanent URI for this community
Visit the Biomechanics & Movement Science Program for more information.
The UDSpace community for this department contains open-access research materials created by members of this department.
Browse
Browsing Biomechanics & Movement Science Program by Author "Arhos, Elanna K."
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Clinically relevant subgroups exist among athletes who have ruptured their anterior cruciate ligaments: A Delaware-Oslo Cohort Study(Arthritis Care & Research, 2023-03-01) Arhos, Elanna K.; Pohlig, Ryan T.; Di Stasi, Stephanie; Risberg, May Arna; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn; Grävare Silbernagel, KarinObjective: To identify subgroups of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries based on patient characteristics, self-reported outcomes, and functional performance at baseline, and to associate subgroups with long-term outcomes after ACL rupture. Methods: A total of 293 participants (45.7% male, mean ± SD age 26.2 ± 9.4 years, days from injury 58 ± 35) were enrolled after effusion, pain, and range of motion impairments were resolved and quadriceps strength was at least 70% of the uninvolved limb. Mixture modeling was used to uncover latent subgroups without a prior group classification using probabilistic assignment. Variables include demographics, functional testing, and self-reported outcome measures. Radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (OA; i.e., Kellgren/Lawrence grade of ≥1) in the involved knee at 5 years after injury was the primary outcome of interest. Chi-square tests assessed differences in the presence of radiographic OA in the involved knee between subgroups at 5 years after ACL rupture. Secondary outcomes of interest included radiographic OA in the uninvolved knee, return to preinjury sport by 2 years, operative status, and clinical OA (classified using Luyten et al criteria) at 5 years. Results: Four distinct subgroups exist after ACL rupture (younger good self-report, younger poor self-report, older poor self-report, older good self-report) with 30%, 31%, 47%, and 53%, respectively, having involved knee OA. The percentage of radiographic OA was not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.059). Conclusion: The prevalence of OA in all subgroups is highly concerning. These results suggest there are unique subgroupings of individuals that may guide treatment after ACL rupture and reconstruction by providing support for developing a patient-centered approach.Item Markerless motion capture: What clinician-scientists need to know right now(Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport Plus, 2022-11-14) Ito, Naoaki; Sigurðsson, Haraldur B.; Seymore, Kayla D.; Arhos, Elanna K.; Buchanan, Thomas S.; Snyder-Mackler, Lynn; Grävare Silbernagel, KarinMarkerless motion capture (mocap) could be the future of motion analysis. The purpose of this report was to describe our team of clinicians and scientists’ exploration of markerless mocap (Theia 3D) and share data for others to explore (link: https://osf.io/6vh7z/?view_only=c0e00984e94a48f28c8d987a2127339d). Simultaneous mocap was performed using markerless and marker-based systems for walking, squatting, and forward hopping. Segment lengths were more variable between trials using markerless mocap compared to marker-based mocap. Sagittal plane angles were most comparable between systems at the knee joint followed by the ankle and hip. Frontal and transverse plane angles were not comparable between systems. The data collection experience using markerless mocap was simpler, faster, and user friendly. The ease of collection was in part offset by the added data transfer and processing times, and the lack of troubleshooting flexibility. If used selectively with proper understanding of limitations, markerless mocap can be exciting technology to advance the field of motion analysis.