Pacanowski, Carly R.Pisetsky, Emily M.Berg, Kelly C.Crosby, Ross D.Crow, Scott J.Linde, Jennifer A.Mitchell, James E.Engel, Scott G.Klein, Marjorie H.Smith, Tracey L.Le Grange, DanielWonderlich, Stephen A.Peterson, Carol B.2017-04-112017-04-11Copyright2016-03-18Pacanowski, Carly R., et al. "Self‐weighing behavior in individuals with eating disorders." International Journal of Eating Disorders 49.8 (2016): 817-821.1098-108Xhttp://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/21221Publisher's PDFObjective To describe the frequency of self-weighing and reactions to prescribed weekly weighing among individuals with eating disorder (ED) diagnoses, and to compare individuals weighing more or less frequently on mass index (BMI) and the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) subscales. Method Baseline EDE and demographics from five studies (N = 758). Results Self-weighing was most frequent among individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN), followed by those with bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge eating disorder (BED). On average, participants reacted moderately negative to prescribed weekly weighing. No relationship between weighing frequency and BMI was evident in any sample. There was indication of greater pathology (i.e., restraint, shape concern, weight concern, global) in AN with more frequent weighing. In BN, mixed evidence emerged to support a relationship between more frequent weighing and higher shape concern, weight concern, and global score. In BED, higher restraint was found in those who weighed versus those who did not. Discussion Weighing frequency in each eating disorder (ED) sample was to some extent associated with greater ED severity, but not BMI. Future research should examine relationships between self-weighing, reactions to changing weighing frequency, and ED symptomatology in both ED and non-ED groups to understand the impact of self-weighing in heterogeneous populations.en-USArticle is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.ArticleDOI: 10.1002/eat.22537