Baah, Robert2016-09-272016-09-272014-07-311536-1837http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/19740Three variations in narrational unreliability are discussed along with four proposals aimed at formulating a teleology of unreliable narrator. The variations include back-loading signals of unreliability, deploying partial awareness of self-incrimination, and using a limited first person narrator. Apropos teleology, we argue that unreliable narration helps to subvert the moral and or epistemological worldview of the narrator. Secondly, unreliable narration facilitates an effective examination of the strengths and weaknesses of unbridled imagination. In addition, unreliable narration permits a reconceptualization of our understanding of truth and falsehood. Finally, unreliable narrators who overindulge in imaginary flights provide one of the best sources of narrative humor. Reinaldo Arenas, José Donoso are Jorge Luis Borges provide the raw materials for this dual effort in design and purpose.enCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlikeUnreliable narrationDefault frameworkFrame theoryTeleologyUnintentional self-incriminationInterpretive strategiesDetective frameworkNaturalizationBack-loadingPartial self-incriminationLimited first person narratorSpiritus vivicansUnbridled imaginationTruthFalsehoodVariations on and the Teleology of Unreliable NarrationArticle