Kecinski, MaikMesser, Kent D.2017-06-072017-06-072017-06http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/21436Differences between private and public decision-making are quantified using willingness-to-accept (WTA) data collected in artefactual field experiments. Participants first make decisions in a second-price auction (private rounds) followed by majority-rule voting (public rounds) on the median price collected in the private rounds. Results suggest that other-regarding behavior in the public rounds regarding stigma and disgust can significantly reduce WTA. Chat-box communication can further reduce WTA, and social preferences, education, and unrelated communication are the primary drivers that lead participants to accept significantly lower prices for potentially disgusting tasks. The results have application for sustainable, cost-effective recycled water projects.CommunicationSecond-price auctionOther-regarding behaviorMajority-rule votingWillingness to acceptExperimental economicsWater recyclingWorking Paper