Sean F. EllisOlesya M. SavchenkoKent D. Messer2022-12-012022-12-012022-11-19JEL Classification: B41, C83, C93https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/31603Keywords: Non-representative convenience sampling, field experiments, online recruitment, representative samplingRecruitment of representative and generalizable samples is a major challenge for researchers conducting economic field experiments. Limited access to representative samples or the high cost of obtaining them often leads to the recruitment of non-representative convenience samples. This research compares the findings from two field experiments involving 860 adults: one from a non-representative in-person convenience sample and one from a representative online counterpart. We find no meaningful differences in the key behaviors of interest between these two samples. These findings contribute to a growing body of literature demonstrating that non-representative convenience samples can be sufficient in certain contexts.en-USWorking Paper