The UDSpace Institutional Repository will be unavailable from August 10th - 12th for a planned upgrade.

Weather and glufosinate efficacy; a retrospective analysis looking forward to the changing climate

dc.contributor.authorLandau, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorBurns, Erin
dc.contributor.authorDeWerff, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorDobbels, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorEssman, Alyssa
dc.contributor.authorFlessner, Michael
dc.contributor.authorGage, Karla
dc.contributor.authorHager, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorJhala, Amit
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Paul O.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, William
dc.contributor.authorLancaster, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorLingenfelter, Dwight
dc.contributor.authorLoux, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Eric
dc.contributor.authorOwen, Micheal
dc.contributor.authorSarangi, Debalin
dc.contributor.authorSikkema, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSprague, Christy
dc.contributor.authorVanGessel, Mark
dc.contributor.authorWerle, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Bryan
dc.contributor.authorWilliams II, Martin
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-22T19:04:27Z
dc.date.available2025-01-22T19:04:27Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-08
dc.descriptionThis article was originally published in Weed Science. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.101. © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America. This article will be embargoed until 07/08/2025.
dc.description.abstractFoliar-applied postemergence applications of glufosinate are often applied to glufosinate-resistant crops to provide nonselective weed control without significant crop injury. Rainfall, air temperature, solar radiation, and relative humidity near the time of application have been reported to affect glufosinate efficacy. However, previous research may have not captured the full range of weather variability to which glufosinate may be exposed to prior to or following application. Additionally, climate models suggest more extreme weather will become the norm, further expanding this weather range glufosinate can be exposed to. The objective of this research was to quantify the probability of successful weed control (efficacy ≥85%) with glufosinate applied to some key weed species across a broad range of weather conditions. A database of >10,000 North American herbicide evaluation trials was used in this study. The database was filtered to include treatments with a single POST application of glufosinate applied to waterhemp (Amaranthus tuburculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer), morningglory species (Ipomoea spp.), and/or giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herm.) <15cm in height. These species were chosen because they are well represented in the database and listed as common and troublesome weed species in both corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (Van Wychen 2020, 2022). Individual random forest models were created. Low rainfall (≤20 mm) over the five days prior to glufosinate application was detrimental to the probability of successful control of A. tuburculatus and S. faberi. Lower relative humidity (≤70%) and solar radiation (≤23 MJ m-1 day-1) the day of application reduced the probability of successful weed control in most cases. Additionally, the probability of successful control decreased for all species when average air temperature over the first five days after application was ≤25C. As climate continues to change and become more variable, the risk of unacceptable control of several common species with glufosinate is likely to increase.
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by U.S. Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service Research Project No. 5012-12220- 010-000D. Mention of a trademark, proprietary product, or vendor does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of the product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products or vendors that also may be suitable.
dc.identifier.citationLandau, Christopher, Kevin Bradley, Erin Burns, Ryan DeWerff, Anthony Dobbels, Alyssa Essman, Michael Flessner, et al. “Weather and Glufosinate Efficacy; a Retrospective Analysis Looking Forward to the Changing Climate.” Weed Science, 2025, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/wsc.2024.101.
dc.identifier.issn1550-2759
dc.identifier.urihttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/35740
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherWeed Science
dc.subjectclimate change
dc.subjectglufosinate
dc.subjectherbicide efficacy
dc.subjectsolar radiation
dc.subjectweather variability
dc.subjectclimate action
dc.subjectzero hunger
dc.titleWeather and glufosinate efficacy; a retrospective analysis looking forward to the changing climate
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Weather and glufosinate efficacy a retrospective analysis looking forward to the changing climate.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: