Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios

dc.contributor.authorTedone, Melissa
dc.contributor.authorGrayburn, Rosie
dc.contributor.authorWittine, Janet
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-17T13:37:16Z
dc.date.available2025-01-17T13:37:16Z
dc.date.issued2025-01-11
dc.descriptionThis is an original manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conservation on 01/11/2025, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2024.2448394. © The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works 2025. This article will be embargoed until 07/11/2026.
dc.description.abstractToxic heavy metal pigments are known to be found in nineteenth-century, mass-produced, Euro-American bookbindings. A lack of data, standards, and regulations for exposure to heavy metal pigments in the cultural heritage sector limits understanding of when such bookbindings might present the greatest health and safety risk and how best to assess such risk. This case study measures the friability of arsenic, chromium, and lead based pigments in a sampling of nineteenth-century bookbindings through three scenarios: first, in their naturally aged, intact state; second, during a water event simulation; and third, after salvage and air-drying from the water disaster simulation. The data demonstrate that the risk of exposure to these heavy metals increases during and after a water event, with exposure to arsenic presenting the highest degree of risk.
dc.description.sponsorshipWe thank Dr. Johnathan Tedesco and the Lake Erie College STEM Scholars program for supporting intern Janet Wittine’s 2024 summer internship at Winterthur. Alexandra Alvis generously donated a bookbinding for destructive testing from their personal set of emerald green, French cartonnage bookbindings. Todd Pattison provided an emerald green paper binding from his personal collection for non-destructive testing. Brittany Murray (WUDPAC ‘25), Karissa Muratore, and Dr. Joelle Wickens shared helpful suggestions about research questions and parameters, and we appreciate their time and expertise. Winterthur Museum, Garden & Library provided funds for testing library collection materials. The University of Delaware Department of Art Conservation provided research startup funds that supported the additional testing of study collection materials. We are grateful to the Winterthur/University of Delaware Program in Art Conservation (WUDPAC) for investing in an historical bookbinding study collection that can be used for destructive analysis when necessary; we do not make use of this privilege lightly.
dc.identifier.citationTedone, Melissa, Rosie Grayburn, and Janet Wittine. 2025. “Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios.” Studies in Conservation, January, 1–8. doi:10.1080/00393630.2024.2448394.
dc.identifier.issn2047-0584
dc.identifier.urihttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/35728
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherStudies in Conservation
dc.subjectarsenic
dc.subjectchromium
dc.subjectlead
dc.subjectheavy metals
dc.subjectbookbinding
dc.subjectbookcloth
dc.subjectbook
dc.subjectdisaster recovery
dc.titleHandling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Handling ‘Poison Books’ Dry Versus Wet Scenarios.pdf
Size:
4.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: