Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios
| dc.contributor.author | Tedone, Melissa | |
| dc.contributor.author | Grayburn, Rosie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wittine, Janet | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-17T13:37:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-01-17T13:37:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-01-11 | |
| dc.description | This is an original manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Studies in Conservation on 01/11/2025, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2024.2448394. © The International Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works 2025. This article will be embargoed until 07/11/2026. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Toxic heavy metal pigments are known to be found in nineteenth-century, mass-produced, Euro-American bookbindings. A lack of data, standards, and regulations for exposure to heavy metal pigments in the cultural heritage sector limits understanding of when such bookbindings might present the greatest health and safety risk and how best to assess such risk. This case study measures the friability of arsenic, chromium, and lead based pigments in a sampling of nineteenth-century bookbindings through three scenarios: first, in their naturally aged, intact state; second, during a water event simulation; and third, after salvage and air-drying from the water disaster simulation. The data demonstrate that the risk of exposure to these heavy metals increases during and after a water event, with exposure to arsenic presenting the highest degree of risk. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | We thank Dr. Johnathan Tedesco and the Lake Erie College STEM Scholars program for supporting intern Janet Wittine’s 2024 summer internship at Winterthur. Alexandra Alvis generously donated a bookbinding for destructive testing from their personal set of emerald green, French cartonnage bookbindings. Todd Pattison provided an emerald green paper binding from his personal collection for non-destructive testing. Brittany Murray (WUDPAC ‘25), Karissa Muratore, and Dr. Joelle Wickens shared helpful suggestions about research questions and parameters, and we appreciate their time and expertise. Winterthur Museum, Garden & Library provided funds for testing library collection materials. The University of Delaware Department of Art Conservation provided research startup funds that supported the additional testing of study collection materials. We are grateful to the Winterthur/University of Delaware Program in Art Conservation (WUDPAC) for investing in an historical bookbinding study collection that can be used for destructive analysis when necessary; we do not make use of this privilege lightly. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Tedone, Melissa, Rosie Grayburn, and Janet Wittine. 2025. “Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios.” Studies in Conservation, January, 1–8. doi:10.1080/00393630.2024.2448394. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2047-0584 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/35728 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.publisher | Studies in Conservation | |
| dc.subject | arsenic | |
| dc.subject | chromium | |
| dc.subject | lead | |
| dc.subject | heavy metals | |
| dc.subject | bookbinding | |
| dc.subject | bookcloth | |
| dc.subject | book | |
| dc.subject | disaster recovery | |
| dc.title | Handling ‘Poison Books’: Dry Versus Wet Scenarios | |
| dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Handling ‘Poison Books’ Dry Versus Wet Scenarios.pdf
- Size:
- 4.35 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Main article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.22 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
