Regional Differences in U.S. Consumer Preferencesfor Native Woody Shrubs With Varying AestheticCharacteristics
| Author(s) | Rihn, Alicia | |
| Author(s) | Torres, Ariana P. | |
| Author(s) | Barton, Sue | |
| Author(s) | Behe, Bridget K. | |
| Date Accessioned | 2025-09-16T21:07:56Z | |
| Date Available | 2025-09-16T21:07:56Z | |
| Publication Date | 2025-09-02 | |
| Description | This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2025 The Author(s). Agribusiness published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This article was originally published in Agribusiness. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70030 | |
| Abstract | Native plants offer a variety of aesthetic (e.g., fall colour, fruit, flowers) and functional benefits (e.g., pollinator friendly, wildlife friendly, water management). How these benefits influence consumer choice and perceived value of native versus introduced plants is not well understood. Additionally, the geographic location of the consumer may influence his/her preferences for native species. The present study used an online survey with a discrete choice experiment to elicit regional differences in 2011U.S. consumers’ preferences for native and introduced woody ornamental plant species with fall colour, fruit, and flower characteristics. Results suggest preferences for native plants versus introduced plants rely heavily on the specific type of plant presented, likely due to differences in aesthetics and preferences. Generally, participants had stronger preferences for native plants than introduced species. However, some differences arose. In the fruit and flower aesthetic benefits, one of the native species was valued more than the introduced species, while in the fall colour aesthetic one of the native species was valued less than the introduced species. Regional differences were noted. Industry implications include clearly articulating when a native plant is presented in the retail centre to allow customers to make informed decisions based on their own values and to highlight plant benefits that align with regional needs. | |
| Sponsor | Funding for the project was provided by the Horticulture Research Institute (HRI). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of HRI. | |
| Citation | Rihn, A., Torres, A.P., Barton, S. and Behe, B.K. (2025), Regional Differences in U.S. Consumer Preferences for Native Woody Shrubs With Varying Aesthetic Characteristics. Agribusiness. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70030 | |
| ISSN | 1520-6297 | |
| URL | https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/36623 | |
| Language | en_US | |
| Publisher | Agribusiness | |
| dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | en |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
| Keywords | choice experiment | |
| Keywords | native plant | |
| Keywords | pollinator friendly | |
| Keywords | water management | |
| Keywords | wildlife friendly | |
| Title | Regional Differences in U.S. Consumer Preferencesfor Native Woody Shrubs With Varying AestheticCharacteristics | |
| Type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Regional Differences in U.S. Consumer Preferences for Native Woody Shrubs With Varying Aesthetic Characteristics.pdf
- Size:
- 1.28 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Main article
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 2.22 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: