Beaver Versus Human: The Big Differences in Small Dams
Date
2025-03-27
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
WIREs: Water
Abstract
As beavers (Castor spp.) are reintroduced to streams in the northern hemisphere and nature-based and process-based river restoration emphasizes human-built analogues for beaver dams, it is reasonable to ask how beaver dams and ponds compare to different types of small dams constructed by humans for diverse purposes. We use published research as a basis for comparing the effects of beaver dams and four types of human dams—beaver dam analogues, earthen embankments perpendicular to flow that are used to create stock ponds, check dams, and mill dams. We compare these dams with respect to water balance and three-dimensional hydrologic connectivity, sediment, particulate organic matter and carbon, nutrients, habitat, and biota. These assessments inform us in ranking small dams from generally most beneficial with respect to providing ecosystem services (beaver meadows with multiple dams) to least beneficial (mill dams), recognizing that beaver meadows may not be beneficial at some sites for infrastructure and human property within the river corridor, and mill dams may be beneficial at some sites where they impede upstream migration by invasive species or provide lentic habitat in the river corridor. This comparison among dam types highlights the need for research on the cumulative effects of multiple small dams along a river corridor and across a river catchment, as well as identifying gaps in our understanding of the effects of specific types of dams, including the effects of stock ponds and check dams on carbon and nutrient dynamics.
Graphical Abstract available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70019
Illustration of the net benefits and costs of different types of dams considered in this paper. The types of dams are ordered by relative benefit from left to right, with the most beneficial on the left. The number of + symbols under benefits and − symbols under costs indicate the likely magnitude of the effect, from + for small effect to +++ for substantial effect. The inset photo for the earthen embankment is a Google Earth view (with scale bar) for a stock pond in Wyoming.
Description
This article was originally published in WIREs: Water. The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70019.
© 2025 The Author(s). WIREs Water published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords
carbon, check dams, mill dams, nutrients, sediment
Citation
Wohl, E. and Inamdar, S. (2025), Beaver Versus Human: The Big Differences in Small Dams. WIREs Water, 12: e70019. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.70019