What's the problem (and does it matter)?: Exploring the relationship between educators' problem-framing and external research use
| dc.contributor.author | Tilley, Katherine | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-01T17:59:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-02-01T17:59:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2022-09-21T16:09:14Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper documents an investigation into the nature of the relationship between problem-framing and reported engagement with external research evidence in school-based decision-making. This study serves as an important first attempt to explore and describe this potential relationship and its implications for the use of research in schools. Situated within the context of a larger knowledge utilization research center, the current study uses qualitative and quantitative data from 1,343 K-12 educators collected during the large-scale administration of the Survey of Evidence in Education for Schools (SEE-S). Specifically, the study is guided by the following research questions: 1) What are the problems schools addressed in recent decisions and how are those problems understood by individuals working within those schools? 2) What is the relationship between problem-frame and the likelihood of the respondent indicating that research was used in the decision-making process? ☐ The study employed an a priori coding framework to distinguish types of problem-frames, followed by subsequent binary logistic regression analyses to assess the potential relationship between problem-frame type and the likelihood of a respondent indicating that external research was used in a decision-making process. Results suggest that school-based practitioners are facing a wide array of problems and that they understand these problems in diverse ways. Additionally, results of regression analyses provide evidence for the relationship between problem-frame type and reported external research use in decision-making. Specifically, seven problem-frame types were found to have a statistically significant relationship with reported external research use. These findings have implications for how the education research and policy communities understand school-based decision-making and problem-solving and the role that research may play. | |
| dc.description.advisor | Farley-Ripple, Elizabeth | |
| dc.description.degree | Ph.D. | |
| dc.description.department | University of Delaware, School of Education | |
| dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.58088/c3e3-5973 | |
| dc.identifier.unique | 1368007154 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/32194 | |
| dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
| dc.publisher | University of Delaware | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://login.udel.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/what-s-problem-does-matter-exploring-relationship/docview/2719404500/se-2?accountid=10457 | |
| dc.subject | Decision making | |
| dc.subject | Evidence use | |
| dc.subject | Problem-framing | |
| dc.subject | Problem-solving | |
| dc.subject | Research use | |
| dc.title | What's the problem (and does it matter)?: Exploring the relationship between educators' problem-framing and external research use | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
