What's the problem (and does it matter)?: Exploring the relationship between educators' problem-framing and external research use

dc.contributor.authorTilley, Katherine
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-01T17:59:35Z
dc.date.available2023-02-01T17:59:35Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.date.updated2022-09-21T16:09:14Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper documents an investigation into the nature of the relationship between problem-framing and reported engagement with external research evidence in school-based decision-making. This study serves as an important first attempt to explore and describe this potential relationship and its implications for the use of research in schools. Situated within the context of a larger knowledge utilization research center, the current study uses qualitative and quantitative data from 1,343 K-12 educators collected during the large-scale administration of the Survey of Evidence in Education for Schools (SEE-S). Specifically, the study is guided by the following research questions: 1) What are the problems schools addressed in recent decisions and how are those problems understood by individuals working within those schools? 2) What is the relationship between problem-frame and the likelihood of the respondent indicating that research was used in the decision-making process? ☐ The study employed an a priori coding framework to distinguish types of problem-frames, followed by subsequent binary logistic regression analyses to assess the potential relationship between problem-frame type and the likelihood of a respondent indicating that external research was used in a decision-making process. Results suggest that school-based practitioners are facing a wide array of problems and that they understand these problems in diverse ways. Additionally, results of regression analyses provide evidence for the relationship between problem-frame type and reported external research use in decision-making. Specifically, seven problem-frame types were found to have a statistically significant relationship with reported external research use. These findings have implications for how the education research and policy communities understand school-based decision-making and problem-solving and the role that research may play.
dc.description.advisorFarley-Ripple, Elizabeth
dc.description.degreePh.D.
dc.description.departmentUniversity of Delaware, School of Education
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.58088/c3e3-5973
dc.identifier.unique1368007154
dc.identifier.urihttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/32194
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherUniversity of Delaware
dc.relation.urihttps://login.udel.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/what-s-problem-does-matter-exploring-relationship/docview/2719404500/se-2?accountid=10457
dc.subjectDecision making
dc.subjectEvidence use
dc.subjectProblem-framing
dc.subjectProblem-solving
dc.subjectResearch use
dc.titleWhat's the problem (and does it matter)?: Exploring the relationship between educators' problem-framing and external research use
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tilley_udel_0060D_15180.pdf
Size:
1.08 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: