Supports for preservice teachers' metacognitive monitoring and explanations of fraction comparisons

Abstract

The ability to provide clear and comprehensive instructional explanations on mathematical concepts is key to supporting student learning in the classroom. This is especially important when teaching content that students most often struggle with. A large body of literature has established the challenges that elementary students face with developing fraction magnitude concepts. More recent work points to the struggles that both pre- and in-service teachers have with fraction magnitude. Though much work exists on interventions for students in supporting their fraction understanding, there is a dearth of literature on how to support teachers’ provisions of high quality explanations. We designed and evaluated the effectiveness of three instructional supports on elementary pre-service teachers’ (PSTs) revision and improvements of their explanations of fraction concepts. We also examined their metacognitive monitoring and calibration skills as they relate to the revision process. Elementary PSTs were instructed to identify the larger of two fractions and then explain and justify their choice. They had an opportunity to revise after examining different instructional supports depending on their condition. We found that PSTs who were provided with instructional supports that provided a correct and complete exemplar of a fraction magnitude comparison showed greater improvements in their explanations than those who studied example explanations that displayed common misconceptions and errors. Correct and complete exemplars also supported greater detection and correction of errors and omissions in their explanations than those provided with a list of steps focused on structural aspects of the explanation. Hedges’ g effect sizes ranged from medium to large (g = 0.64 to 0.95) for the three comparison tasks. Most PSTs also showed limitations in calibration, indicating over-confidence in the degree of completeness of their explanations at both time points. These findings can inform instructional materials design for pre-service teacher mathematics content courses as they learn how to monitor their own thinking and explain fraction comparisons to students.

Description

This article was originally published in Instructional Science . The version of record is available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09773-0 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 275.9 kb) https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11251-025-09773-0/MediaObjects/11251_2025_9773_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Citation

Guba, T., Barbieri, C., Jansen, A., & Morris, A. (2026). Supports for preservice teachers’ metacognitive monitoring and explanations of fraction comparisons. INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 54 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09773-0

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International