Identifying in-session predictors of treatment outcome for intimate partner violence (IPV): an examination of fathers for change and treatment as usual

dc.contributor.authorShayani, Danielle R.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-23T16:43:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-23T16:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.date.updated2024-09-15T22:02:27Z
dc.description.abstractA significant number of men arrested and mandated to intimate partner violence (IPV) programs are fathers who continue to be involved in the lives of non-offending parents and children. The current standard of care for these fathers is the “Batterer Intervention Program (BIP),” a group-based psychoeducational program with mixed empirical support. A recently developed cognitive-behavioral treatment, Fathers for Change (F4C), has demonstrated promising initial outcomes in a small randomized controlled trial comparing it to an individualized version of BIP (BIP-I). Significant reductions in IPV were reported in both treatments. Participants were 60 treatment-seeking fathers with a recent history of IPV and referred by Child Protective Services. They were randomly assigned to receive F4C (n = 30) or BIP-I (n = 30). Those who completed baseline questionnaires and attended at least one individual session (F4C: n = 26; BIP-I: n = 24) were included in the current study. Outcome measures were father self-report of IPV (Abusive Behavior Inventory: ABI), emotion regulation (Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: DERS), and reflective functioning (Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: RFQ). The CHANGE coding system and the Working Alliance Inventory-Observer form were used to code video recordings of individual-focused sessions from F4C and BIP-I sessions in the same time period. SEM-based moderation models showed that rigidity predicted less improvement (latent change scores) on the RFQ, and avoidance predicted more improvement. Significant interactions of avoidance and self-efficacy with treatment condition suggest that in F4C, high levels of these variables predicted less change in IPV. There were no significant predictors of change in DERS. Together, these findings highlight potential intervention targets that can guide further development and refinement of IPV treatments.
dc.description.advisorHayes, Adele M.
dc.description.degreeM.S.
dc.description.departmentUniversity of Delaware, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.58088/f1gm-0p56
dc.identifier.unique1473834287
dc.identifier.urihttps://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/35124
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.publisherUniversity of Delaware
dc.relation.urihttps://www.proquest.com/pqdtlocal1006271/dissertations-theses/identifying-session-predictors-treatment-outcome/docview/3105614337/sem-2?accountid=10457
dc.subjectIntimate partner violence
dc.subjectBatterer Intervention Program
dc.subjectReflective functioning
dc.subjectFathers for Change
dc.titleIdentifying in-session predictors of treatment outcome for intimate partner violence (IPV): an examination of fathers for change and treatment as usual
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shayani_udel_0060M_71/MSthesis_Shayani_Table 4_Pocket material.pdf
Size:
88.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shayani_udel_0060M_16006.pdf
Size:
653.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.22 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: