Browsing by Author "Ilvento, Thomas W."
Now showing 1 - 9 of 9
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item The Effect of Local Economic Development Policy on Employment Growth in Rural Counties in the Mid-Atlantic Region(Department of Food and Resource Economics, 2002-06) James, Sara-Beth; Ilvento, Thomas W.; Hastings, Steven E.This paper analyzes the role of local economic development strategies on employment. Data were collected on employment changes in 146 nonmetro counties along with a survey of economic development offices (99 surveys, 67.8%). Using OLS, results show that counties that increased economic development emphasis had higher employment growth.Item Factors Influencing Participation in BR&E Programs: A Study of Local Coordinators in Six States(Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE., 2000-05) Ilvento, Thomas W.; Loveridge, ScottThis study used a telephone survey of coordinators of local Business Retention and Expansion Programs (BR&E). The focus of the of the study was to survey BR&E coordinators who conducted programs in the last five years to better understand the factors that lead the community and the coordinator to undertake a BR&E program. We used state program leaders to identify coordinators in six participating states: Kentucky, Maine, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota, and West Virginia. The states represented programs that had a similar approach to BR&E in terms of a community approach which used volunteers by design. A total of 94 Coordinators were identified, and 80 responded to the survey during the summer and fall of 1998 (85% response rate). Of those that did not respond, six were no longer working in the community and could not be contacted. Initial contact was made by phone to explain the project and to schedule a phone interview. Following the initial phone contact, a copy of the survey and an explanation of the project was mailed to the respondent. Most of the interviews were conducted over the phone, but in some cases coordinators sent the surveys in the mail. For the most part coordinators reported few concerns or conflicts prior to beginning a BR&E program. However, local coordinators reported that many businesses were not aware of programs available to them and that this was a motivating force in initiating the program. Furthermore, many indicated that citizens were not knowledgeable about economic development and the problems faced by local businesses. In general the coordinators recognized and supported many of the benefits that we generally use to promote BR&E programs. When asked what attracted them to a BR&E program they answered (in order of importance) -- the program emphasized a response to local business needs; it focused on existing local businesses; it allowed for local decision-making; and there was a written report and written priority projects. Coordinators were also asked to rate factors about the program that influenced their personal participation. Their answers reflected a mix of community and personal interests. The factors with the highest rankings were: it would help firms remain and grow; it would help them develop better contacts with businesses; it would help them learn about businesses; it would help their organization; and the program was needed in the community.Item Land Use Issues in Delaware Agriculture(Department of Applied Economics and Statistics, University of Delaware, Newark, DE., 2002-04) Duke, Joshua M.; Mackenzie, John; Ilvento, Thomas W.Can Delaware’s agriculture coexist (and prosper) in the face of competing land uses over the next twenty years? We believe that maintaining Delaware’s agriculture as a viable land-use alternative depends on the success in addressing three critical challenges. First, will residential, commercial, and industrial land uses be forced to bear the full costs that their land-use decisions visit on Delaware agriculture? Alternatively, will agriculture be fully compensated for its contribution to Delaware’s economy and quality of life? An associated, second challenge, is whether state, county, and local governments will institute incentive-based policies to achieve socially desirable land-use outcomes? It is particularly important that there exist policies to protect and to promote diverse land uses within all three counties. Finally, will spatial land-use patterns evolve, which ensure that agriculture maintains the critical masses necessary for the industry’s economic viability and which insulate producers from the complaints and threats of nonagricultural neighbors? This paper expands on these three challenges and then reviews data on trends in agricultural land use to draw conclusions.Item Moving Beyond Chalk and Talk: Using Problem-Based-Learning In A Research Methods Course Sequence(Department of Food and Economic Resources, 2003-01) Aull-Hyde, Rhonda; Ilvento, Thomas W.The average adult can concentrate for only about eight to ten minutes during an hour-long lecture. Thus, students’ ability to absorb information may be seriously impeded if we college professors talk nonstop. One alternative to the traditional “chalk and talk” instructional method is problem-based learning (PBL) – an instructional approach using real world problems as a format for students to acquire critical thinking, problem solving and group interaction skills. We describe how we transformed a two-course sequence in research methods into a problem-based-learning format. Student-reported benefits of the PBL approach include the need for higher-order thinking, improved group interaction skills, relevance of course material to real world situations, higher motivation and an overall higher level of class enjoyment.Item Public Support for Land Preferences: Measuring Relative Preferences in Delaware(Department of Food and Resource Economics, 2002-02) Duke, Joshua M.; Ilvento, Thomas W.; Hyde, Rhonda A.Public preferences for nonmarket services of preserved land in Delaware are measured using two survey techniques. The results of a conjoint experiment, using a sample of 199 Delawareans, suggest that the environmental and agricultural attributes of preserved land are most important to the residents. The conjoint results also suggest that these services are of substantial value to Delawareans; at the margin, at least, agricultural and environmental preserved land provide net benefits to the public. The analytic hierarchy process is used to assess separate survey results from 129 Delawareans. The results provide specific weights on the relative importance of attributes and qualities of preserved land, which in large part replicate and reinforce the results of the conjoint experiment. Overall, Delawareans seem to be most concerned with keeping farming as a way of life, having access to locally grown agricultural commodities, protecting water quality, and preserving rural character.Item Reciprocal Educational Exchange Between The University of Delaware and Slovak Agricultural University(Department of Food and Resource Economics, 2005-05) Ilvento, Thomas W.; Duke, Joshua M.Item StatLab Annual Report, 2002-2003 Academic Year(2003-08) Rejto, Lidia; Ilvento, Thomas W.; Cai, Xiangrong; Nedanov, Pavel; Xu, YihuanThe purpose of this report is to briefly describe the activities of the StatLab during the 2002/2003 academic year. The StatLab (Statistical Laboratory) was first established at the University of Delaware in 1983. In the Spring of 1997, the lab closed its operation. In 2001, the Statistics Program left the Mathematics Department and moved into the Department of Food and Resource Economics. As part of this move the graduate program in statistics was re-established as was the StatLab.Item StatLab Annual Report, Spring 2002(Food and Resource Economics Department, 2002-06) Rejto, Lidia; Cho, Seoae; Ilvento, Thomas W.Item Supplying Preservation: Landowner Behavior and the Delaware Agricultural Lands Preservation Program(Department of Food and Resource Economics, 2004) Duke, Joshua M.; Ilvento, Thomas W.This report presents the results of a survey of Delaware agricultural landowners about their characteristics, opinions, and behavior regarding participation in the Delaware Agricultural Lands Preservation Program, specifically the PACE and Ag Dist programs. The results demonstrate that participants tend to: • Own larger farms • Be more likely to raise corn, soybeans, and vegetables • Have more decision makers • Be much more likely to be full-time operators • Be more likely to value working outdoors • Be more likely to value ownership to pass land onto children. The results also show that word of mouth is the most common way Delaware landowners learn about the DALP program. Owners’ views about the DALP program were investigated. Key findings include: • Participants and nonparticipants identified preserving land for family as the most attractive aspect of the Ag Dist program • Both groups valued the Ag Dist program for its protection against agricultural nuisance suits and taxes • A majority of PACE participants found that program attractive to relieve pressure from debt, to provide retirement security, and to reinvest in their operations • A minority of Ag Dist participants and nonparticipants were interested in PACE to relieve pressure from debt. Participants had positive experiences with the DALP process. • Large majorities were satisfied with the DALP staff • Large majorities of PACE participants were satisfied with the DALP procedures and outcomes • A large majority of Ag Dist participants were satisfied with DALP procedures • A majority of Ag Dist participants were satisfied with the outcome • A large majority of participants would participate in Ag Dist if they had the chance to do it again • Most PACE participants are using PACE money for investments • Some PACE participants are using PACE money to pay debts.