Browsing by Author "Coyle, Peter C."

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Classification of Geriatric Low Back Pain Based on Hip Characteristics With a 12-Month Longitudinal Exploration of Clinical Outcomes: Findings From Delaware Spine Studies
    (Physical Therapy, 2021-09-24) Hicks, Gregory E.; Pohlig, Ryan T.; Coyle, Peter C.; Sions, J. Megan; Weiner, Debra K.; Pugliese, Jenifer M.; Velasco, Teonette O.; O’Brien, Victoria A.
    Objective: The purpose of this study is to identify geriatric chronic low back pain (LBP) subgroups based on the presence of potentially modifiable hip impairments, using Latent Variable Mixture Modeling (LVMM), and to examine the prospective relationship between these subgroups and key outcomes over time. Methods: Baseline, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month data were collected from a prospective cohort of 250 community-dwelling older adults with chronic LBP. Comprehensive hip (symptoms, strength, range of motion, and flexibility), LBP (intensity and disability), and mobility function (gait speed and 6-Minute Walk Test) examinations were performed at each timepoint. Baseline hip measures were included in LVMM; observed classes/subgroups were compared longitudinally on LBP and mobility function outcomes using mixed models. Results: Regarding LVMM, a model with 3 classes/subgroup fit best. Broadly speaking, subgroups were differentiated best by hip strength and symptom presence: subgroup 1 = strong and nonsymptomatic, subgroup 2 = weak and nonsymptomatic, and subgroup 3 = weak and symptomatic (WS). Regarding longitudinal mixed models, all subgroups improved in most outcomes over time. Specifically, over 12 months, the nonsymptomatic subgroups had lower LBP intensity and disability levels compared with the WS subgroup, whereas the strong and nonsymptomatic subgroup had better mobility function than the 2 “weak” subgroups. Conclusion: These subgroup classifications may help in tailoring specific interventions in future trials. Special attention should be given to the WS subgroup given their consistently poor LBP and mobility function outcomes. Impact: Among older adults with chronic low back pain, there are 3 hip subgroups: “strong and nonsymptomatic,” “weak and nonsymptomatic,” and “weak and symptomatic.” People in these subgroups demonstrate different outcomes and require different treatment; proper identification will result in tailored interventions designed to benefit individual patients. In particular, people in the WS subgroup deserve special attention, because their outcomes are consistently poorer than those in the other subgroups.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Construct validity of movement-evoked pain operational definitions in older adults with chronic low back pain
    (Pain Medicine, 2023-03-21) Knox, Patrick J.; Simon, Corey B.; Pohlig, Ryan T.; Pugliese, Jenifer M.; Coyle, Peter C.; Sions, Jaclyn M.; Hicks, Gregory E.
    Objective: Movement-evoked pain (MeP) may predispose the geriatric chronic low back pain (LBP) population to health decline. As there are differing operational definitions for MeP, the question remains as to whether these different definitions have similar associations with health outcomes in older adults with chronic LBP. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of an observational study. Setting: Clinical research laboratory. Subjects: 226 older adults with chronic LBP. Methods: This secondary analysis used baseline data from a prospective cohort study (n = 250). LBP intensity was collected before and after the repeated chair rise test, stair climbing test, and 6-minute walk test; MeP change scores (ie, sum of pretest pain subtracted from posttest pain) and aggregated posttest pain (ie, sum of posttest pain) variables were calculated. LBP-related disability and self-efficacy were measured by the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS) and Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LOBACS), respectively. Physical function was measured with the Health ABC Performance Battery. Robust regression with HC3 standard errors was used to evaluate adjusted associations between both MeP variables and disability, self-efficacy, and physical function. Results: Greater aggregated posttest MeP was independently associated with worse disability (b = 0.593, t = 2.913, P = .004), self-efficacy (b = –0.870, t = –3.110, P = .002), and physical function (b = –0.017, t = –2.007, P = .039). MeP change scores were not associated with any outcome (all P > .050). Conclusions: Aggregate posttest MeP was linked to poorer health outcomes in older adults with chronic LBP, but MeP change scores were not. Future studies should consider that the construct validity of MeP paradigms partially depends on the chosen operational definition.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Gait asymmetry is associated with performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation
    (Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, 2021-10-17) Seth, Mayank; Coyle, Peter C.; Pohlig, Ryan T.; Beisheim, Emma H.; Horne, John R.; Hicks, Gregory E.; Sions, Jaclyn Megan
    BACKGROUND Adults with lower-limb amputation walk with an asymmetrical gait and exhibit poor functional outcomes, which may negatively impact quality-of-life. OBJECTIVE To evaluate associations between gait asymmetry and performance-based physical function among adults with lower-limb amputation. METHODS A cross-sectional study involving 38 adults with a unilateral transtibial (N = 24; 62.5 ± 10.5 years) or transfemoral amputation (N = 14; 59.9 ± 9.5 years) was conducted. Following gait analysis (capturing step length and stance time asymmetry at self-selected (SSWS) and fast walking speeds (FWS)), participants completed performance-based measures (i.e. Timed Up and Go (TUG), the 10-Meter Walk Test (10mwt), and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)). RESULTS Step length and stance time asymmetry (at SSWS and FWS) were significantly correlated with each performance-based measure (p < .001 to p = .035). Overall, models with gait measures obtained at SSWS explained 40.1%, 46.8% and 40.1% of the variance in TUG-time (p = .022), 10mwt-speed (p = .003) and 6MWT-distance (p = .010), respectively. Models with gait measures obtained at FWS explained 70.0%, 59.8% and 51.8% of the variance in TUG-time (p < .001), 10mwt-speed (p < .001), and 6MWT-distance (p < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Increases in step length or stance time asymmetry are associated with increased TUG-time, slower 10mwt-speed, and reduced 6MWT-distance. Findings suggest gait asymmetry may be a factor in poor functional outcomes following lower-limb amputation.