Dynamic shear rheology of a thixotropic suspension: Comparison of an improved structure-based model with large amplitude oscillatory shear experiments
Date
2016-03-29
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
The Society of Rheology
Abstract
Rheological measurements on a model thixotropic suspension by Dullaert and Mewis [J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 139(1–2), 21–30
(2006); Rheol. Acta 45, 23–32 (2005)] are extended to include large amplitude oscillatory shear (LAOS) flow, shear flow reversal, and a
novel unidirectional LAOS flow to provide an extended rheological data set for testing constitutive models. We use this extended data set to
test a new structure-based model developed by improving the Delaware thixotropic model [A. Mujumdar et al., J. Non-Newtonian Fluid
Mech. 102, 157–178 (2002); A. J. Apostolidis et al., J. Rheol. 59, 275–298 (2015)]. Model parameters are determined from steady, small amplitude
oscillatory, and step shear rate tests. Holding those parameters fixed, model predictions are compared to LAOS experiments. Similar
comparisons are made for three contemporary models from the literature. Two of these models use a scalar internal structural parameter and
include the modified Jeffreys model proposed by de Souza Mendes and Thompson [Rheol. Acta 52, 673–694 (2013)]. The third model is
based on fluidity additivity [F. Bautista et al., J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 80, 93–113 (1999)]. A common weakness in all models is
shown to be the use of scalar order parameters that cannot account for the reversal of flow directionality inherent in LAOS flow. This is further
illustrated by comparison with flow reversal and unidirectional LAOS experiments.
Description
Publisher's PDF.
Keywords
Citation
Armstrong, Matthew J., Antony N. Beris, and Norman J. Wagnera. Dynamic Shear Rheology of Thixotropic Suspensions: Comparison of Structure-Based Models with Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Experiments. J. Rheol. 60, 433 (2016); http://dx.doi.org/10.1122/1.4943986