"I don't know what I don't know": understanding the experiences of women seeking civil protection orders in Delaware
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Delaware
Abstract
Women who have decided to seek legal remedies through civil protection orders are taking bold steps to end abusive relationships. However, the civil protection order process can be complicated by situational and relational obstacles, causing increased emotional distress for women during a time when critical decisions are made. Women seeking civil protection orders must complete detailed legal paperwork instrumental in their case and make important decisions regarding their needs. In Delaware, cases may be presented at trials where parties can bring witnesses, supply evidence, and testify in court. To avoid a trial and testifying in court, parties may agree to a consent process. In these situations, the courts do not make a finding of abuse and order conditions as agreed upon by the parties. This study is part of a larger mixed-methods National Science Foundation (NSF) longitudinal study of women seeking civil protection orders in Delaware. Research used the lenses of Ecological Systems and Procedural Justice Theories. To understand victims' perceptions about the civil court process, consent and full hearing, and institutional support, semi-structured qualitative interviews were analyzed. The findings revealed the following: (a) victims lacked a general knowledge about the protection order process and resources, (b) participants with institutional support reported increased procedural and emotional support, (c) participants noted challenges with the consent process, and (d) minority Black and mixed-race participants were more likely to be discouraged and treated poorly by court personnel.